Godwin

(HC) Cabrera v. Godwin

Bad Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 24, 20211:20-cv-01738California1,714 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 OMAR CABRERA, Case No. 1:20-cv-01738-HBK Petitioner, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

PETITIONER’S MOTION TO STAY

v. SHOULD NOT BE DENIED RON GOODWIN, PEOPLE OF THE RESPONSE DUE IN THIRTY DAYS

STATE OF CALIFORNIA,

(Doc. No. 3) Respondents.

17 18 Petitioner Omar Cabrera, a state prisoner proceeding with counsel, seeks a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Doc. No. 1). Before the court is petitioner’s motion for a stay and abeyance under Rhines. (Doc. No. 3); Rhines v. Weber, 544 U.S. 269 (2005). The court ordered respondents to respond to the motion to stay (Doc. No. 4), and respondents filed a notice of non- opposition to petitioner’s motion to stay. (Doc. No. 6). However, because petitioner has failed to demonstrate that he meets the requirements of Rhines, the court will provide him with notice of his options for how this case may proceed and order him to show cause why his motion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.