Criswell

Criswell v. Boudreaux

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 24, 20211:20-cv-01048California737 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHARLES CRISWELL, et al., No. 1:20-cv-01048-DAD-SAB Plaintiffs, v. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION

TO FILE A SUPPLEMENTAL PLEADING

MICHAEL BOUDREAUX, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Tulare County, (Doc. No. 59) 15 Defendant.

17 This matter is before the court on plaintiffs’ unopposed motion for leave to file a supplemental pleading pursuant to Rule 15(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. No. 59.) Pursuant to General Order No. 617 addressing the public health emergency posed by the coronavirus pandemic, on February 26, 2021, the court took this matter under submission to be decided on the papers. (Doc. No. 60.) For the reasons explained below, the court will grant plaintiffs’ motion. Rule 15(d) provides that On motion and reasonable notice, the court may, on just terms, permit a party to serve a supplemental pleading setting out any transaction, occurrence, or event that happened after the date…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.