Sheriff

(PC) Medina Vasquez v. Sheriff

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 24, 20211:20-cv-00557California5,553 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROMMEL D. MEDINA VASQUEZ, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-00557-DAD-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. ) RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION

FOR FAILURE TO STATE A COGNIZABLE

SHERIFF, et al., ) CLAIM FOR RELIEF ) Defendants. ) (ECF No. 17) ) ) ) )

Plaintiff Rommel D. Medina Vasquez is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s second amended complaint, filed September 18, 2020. I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.