Winn
(PS) Young v. Winn
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL CHRISTOPHER YOUNG, No. 2:20-cv-1472 TLN DB PS 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v.
JUDGE JOHN WINN, ROBIN LESLIE
PEARL, Defendants. 17 Plaintiff Daniel Christopher Young is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff commenced this action on July 22, 2020, by filing a complaint and paying the required filing fee. (ECF No. 1.) On July 23, 2020, summons for the defendants were issued. (ECF No. 2.) That same day plaintiff was served with a letter that advised plaintiff that Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that a defendant must be dismissed if service of the summons and complaint is not accomplished on the defendant within 90 days after the complaint was filed. (ECF No. 3.) More than 90 days passed, plaintiff did not file proof of service on any defendant nor did any defendant appear in…