Traffic Tech, Inc. v. Velox Group, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TRAFFIC TECH, INC., No. 2:19-cv-1793-KJM-JDP Plaintiff, v. ORDER VELOX GROUP, INC., Defendant. 16 Plaintiff’s motion for entry of default judgment was heard before the assigned Magistrate Judge on October 15, 2020. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by Local Rule 302(c)(19) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On October 22, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendation, which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections have been filed. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court…