Arnette

(PC) Jones v. Arnette

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 24, 20211:16-cv-01212California840 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEREMY JONES, 1:16-cv-01212-DAD-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE

WHY DEFENDANTS LOPEZ AND VASQUEZ

vs. SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO EFFECT SERVICE

ARNETTE, et al., (ECF No. 69.)

Defendants. THIRTY DAY DEADLINE

19 I. BACKGROUND Jeremy Jones (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), U.S.C. § 12132. This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint, filed on September 10, 2018, on (1) Plaintiff’s ADA claims against defendants Vasquez, Keener, Gonzales,1 Flores, Arnett,2 Zamora, and Lopez, in their official capacities; 2)

27 1 Sued as Gonzalez. 28 2 Sued as Arnette. Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment conditions of confinement claims against defendants Vasquez, Keener, and Gonzales;…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.