Arnette
(PC) Jones v. Arnette
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 24, 20211:16-cv-01212California840 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JEREMY JONES, 1:16-cv-01212-DAD-GSA-PC
Plaintiff, ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE
WHY DEFENDANTS LOPEZ AND VASQUEZ
vs. SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO EFFECT SERVICE
ARNETTE, et al., (ECF No. 69.)
Defendants. THIRTY DAY DEADLINE
19 I. BACKGROUND Jeremy Jones (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), U.S.C. § 12132. This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint, filed on September 10, 2018, on (1) Plaintiff’s ADA claims against defendants Vasquez, Keener, Gonzales,1 Flores, Arnett,2 Zamora, and Lopez, in their official capacities; 2)
27 1 Sued as Gonzalez. 28 2 Sued as Arnette. Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment conditions of confinement claims against defendants Vasquez, Keener, and Gonzales;…