Diaz

(PC) Sandoval v. Diaz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 25, 20211:20-cv-01374California1,376 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JULIO SANDOVAL, No. 1:20-cv-01374-NONE-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR AN INJUNCTION BE

DENIED

RALPH M. DIAZ, et al., (ECF No. 20) Defendants.

TWENTY-ONE-DAY DEADLINE

16 Plaintiff Julio Sandoval (“Plaintiff”) is a state inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil-rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the complaint commencing this action on September 28, 2020. (ECF No. 1). After the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found he failed to state any claims, (ECF No. 14), Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint on February 16, 2021, (ECF No. 17). The Court entered a screening order on March 1, 2021, finding that Plaintiff again failed to state any claims. (ECF No. 18). On March 9, 2021, Plaintiff filed an “Order to Show Cause for a Preliminary Injunction,” (ECF No. 20), which the Court construes as a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.