Cassol

(PC) Ford v. Cassol

Bad Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 25, 20212:20-cv-02087California1,249 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LARRY FORD, No. 2:20-cv-2087-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel and in forma pauperis in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. After two dismissals pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (ECF Nos. 4 & 15), he has filed a second amended complaint (ECF No. 16). Federal courts must engage in a preliminary screening of cases in which prisoners seek redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must identify cognizable claims or dismiss the complaint, or any portion of the complaint, if the complaint “is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted,” or “seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief.” Id. § 1915A(b). The second amended complaint (ECF No. 16) is limited to one claim. It alleges that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.