Cudjo

(PC) Kendrid v. Cudjo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 25, 20212:20-cv-02546California1,808 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FORREST KENDRID, No. 2:20-cv-02546 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

CUDJO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff alleges defendants used excessive physical force and were deliberately indifferent to plaintiff’s serious medical needs in violation of his Eighth Amendment rights. Plaintiff also alleges the defendants violated his right to due process under the Fourteenth Amendment. Before the court is plaintiff’s motion for the appointment of counsel and plaintiff’s motion for temporary restraining order (TRO). (ECF No. 5.) For the reasons set forth below, this court will deny plaintiff’s motion for the appointment of counsel and recommend that plaintiff’s motion for TRO be denied. MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL Plaintiff requests the appointment of counsel. He claims…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.