Kampa

(PS) Gifford v. Kampa

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 25, 20212:17-cv-02421California10,741 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROGER GIFFORD, No. 2:17-CV-2421-TLN-DMC Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS PETER KAMPA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. Pending before the court are the following motions:

ECF No. Defendant Winston’s motion to dismiss.

ECF No. Defendant Winston’s motion to strike.

ECF No. Hornbrook Community Services District (HCSD) Defendants’ amended motion to dismiss. 22 ECF No. Defendant Winston’s motion to revoke Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status, declare Plaintiff a vexatious litigant, require Plaintiff to post security. 24 The HCSD Defendants’ motion is brought on behalf of: The HCSD, Peter Kampa, Robert Puckett, Sr., Melissa Tulledo, Julie Bowles, Clint Dingman, and Ernest Goff. See ECF No. 26, pg. 1. Plaintiff filed various responses on July 12, 2019. See ECF Nos. 42-47. / / / …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.