Rossi

(PC) Ruiz v. Rossi

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 25, 20212:20-cv-01066California669 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROGELIO MAY RUIZ, No. 2:20-cv-1066 WBS DB P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS J. ROSSI, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims his rights were violated in connection with a rules violation report he received in June 2019. Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of the court’s denial of his motion to appoint counsel (ECF No. 11) and denial of his motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 12). For the reasons set forth below, the court will recommend that his motion be denied. Plaintiff states that he speaks only Spanish and does not have any funds in his inmate trust account. Much of plaintiff’s motion is written in Spanish. Plaintiff argues that the court should not consider some of his prior cases as strikes because he was transferred several times interfering 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.