(PS) Lull v. County of Placer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 25, 20212:19-cv-02444California6,311 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 CHRISTOPHER M. LULL, No. 2:19-cv-2444 KJM AC PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS COUNTY OF PLACER, et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiff is proceeding in this matter pro se, and pre-trial proceedings are accordingly referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). All defendants except Ryan Zender, who has not appeared, move for dismissal of plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 21). ECF No. 23; see also ECF No. 27. Plaintiff has opposed the motion. ECF No. 26. For the reasons that follow, the undersigned recommends that the motion to dismiss be granted as to all claims, and that no further leave to amend be granted. I. BACKGROUND A. Procedural History Plaintiff commenced this action on December 6, 2019. ECF No. 1 at 1. All named defendants except Ryan Zender have appeared. It does not appear that Zender has been served. 26 A previous lawsuit arising…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.