Newsom

(PC) J'Weial v. Newsom

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 25, 20212:19-cv-02239California726 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 XAVIER LUMAR J’WEIAL, No. 2:19-cv-2239 KJM KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On April 8, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case, including a careful review of petitioner’s objections to the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations. Having carefully reviewed 26…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.