(PS) Parker v. JP Morgan Chase

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AKIKA PARKER, No. 2:20-cv-00455-KJM-CKD PS Plaintiff, ORDER v. JP MORGAN CHASE, Defendant. 16 On May 13, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed.1 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court /////

1 Plaintiff did file a Second Amended Complaint without first obtaining leave to do so. (ECF No. 6.) The court construes this filing as a motion for leave to amend the complaint and denies the motion. The proposed…