(SS) Schillaci v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 26, 20211:20-cv-00628California357 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

APRIL SCHILLACI, Case No. 1:20-cv-00628-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANT TO

FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING OR SHOW

v. CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD

NOT BE DEEMED UNOPPOSED

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

FIVE DAY DEADLINE

Defendant.

16 Plaintiff April Schillaci (“Plaintiff”) filed this action seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying an application for disability benefits pursuant to the Social Security Act. On February 16, 2021 an order was filed extending the time for Plaintiff to file her opening brief and setting forth a briefing scheduling. (ECF No. 19.) Plaintiff filed her opening brief on February 22, 2021. (ECF No. 20.) Pursuant to the February 16, 2021 order, Defendant’s opposition was to be filed on or before March 24, 2021. (ECF No. 19.) The date has passed and Defendant has not filed an opposition to Plaintiff’s opening brief. Local Rule 110…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.