(SS)Prudente

(SS)Prudente v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 26, 20211:21-cv-00322California1,030 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FLORIDALMA V. PRUDENTE, Case No. 1:21-cv-00322-SAB

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DENYING

v. PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, DIRECTING CLERK OF THE COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN MATTER TO

Defendant. DISTRICT JUDGE

(ECF No. 4)

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS

18 On March 4, 2021, Floridalma V. Prudente (“Plaintiff”) filed the complaint in this action seeking judicial review of the final decision of Defendant Commissioner of Social Security (“Defendant”) denying her application for benefits under the Social Security Act. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff also filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis without prepayment of the filing fee on the same day. (ECF No. 2.) Based on the initial application, the Court found the income stated was well above the poverty level and that it did not appear Plaintiff was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.