MD Helicopters v. Aerometals, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 26, 20212:16-cv-02249California3,829 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MD HELICOPTERS, INC., No. 2:16-cv-02249-TLN-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO BIFURCATE DISCOVERY

AEROMETALS, INC., Defendant. 16 This matter is before the Court on Defendant Aerometals, Inc.’s (“Defendant”) Motion to Bifurcate Discovery. (ECF No. 137). Plaintiff MD Helicopters, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) has filed an opposition (ECF No. 144), and Defendant has filed a reply (ECF No. 145). For the reasons set forth herein, Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED. (ECF No. 137.) /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff is a helicopter manufacturer seeking damages and injunctive relief based on Defendant’s alleged copyright infringement of certain helicopter parts. One of Plaintiff’s most successful product lines is a family of helicopters based on the single engine MD 500 model, which includes civilian and military helicopters. (ECF No. 1 at ¶ 9.) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.