(PS) Banga v. Ameriprise Auto & Home Ins. Agency
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KAMLESH BANGA, No. 2:18-cv-01072 MCE AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER AMERIPRISE AUTO HOME INSURANCE AGENCY, et al., 15 Defendants.
17 This case is before the court on plaintiff’s motion to strike defendants’ affirmative defenses to her Third Amended Complaint. ECF No. 92. Defendants oppose the motion. ECF No. 97. The motion is DENIED for the reasons set forth below. I. Background This action stems from a dispute over insurance coverage for alleged water damage to plaintiff’s home as a result of a windstorm on January 18, 2016. Revised Third Amended Complaint (“RTAC”), ECF No. 67-3 at 1. Plaintiff’s operative RTAC alleges, in relevant part, as follows. On September 16, 2010, plaintiff purchased a homeowner’s insurance policy from Ameriprise, with the issuing the Policy No BH00013346. ECF No. 67-3 at 4. On January 18, 2016, as a result of high windstorm, the roof of plaintiff’s house was…