(HC) Roberson v. Sacramento County Superior Court

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 26, 20212:19-cv-02325California1,151 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARLON ROBERSON, No. 2:19-cv-02325-TLN-GGH Petitioner, v. ORDER SACRAMENTO COUNTY SUPERIOR

COURT,

15 Respondent.

17 This matter is before the Court on remand from the Ninth Circuit for the limited purpose of granting or denying a certificate of appealability (ECF No. 13) and on Petitioner Marlon Roberson’s (“Petitioner”) Motion for Certificate of Appealability (ECF No. 14). After carefully considering the Ninth Circuit’s instructions and Petitioner’s arguments, the Court DENIES Petitioner’s Motion. (ECF No. 14.) Petitioner, proceeding pro se, initiated this action for a writ of mandamus alleging Respondent Sacramento County Superior Court violated his Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights. (ECF No. 1.) On December 5, 2019, the magistrate judge issued an Order and Findings and Recommendations, ordering a district judge to be assigned to this action and recommending Petitioner’s application for a writ of mandamus be dismissed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.