(PS) Engelbrecht v. Union Bank

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 29, 20211:18-cv-00740California1,045 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TONYA ENGELBRECHT, Case No. 1:18-cv-00740-DAD-EPG Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION BE

v. DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, DUE TO

PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO PROSECUTE THIS

UNION BANK, et al., CASE AND FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH A

COURT ORDER

Defendants.

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

FOURTEEN (14) DAYS

17 Tonya Engelbrecht (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se in this action. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff filed the complaint commencing this action on March 29, 2018. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff did not pay the filing fee and instead submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 20 U.S.C. § 1915 on March 30, 2018. (ECF No. 2.) On April 4, 2018, Plaintiff filed a request to 21 amend/grant IFP status (ECF No. 4). However, Plaintiff did not use the proper form and did not 22 include all information necessary to determine whether she was entitled to proceed in forma 23…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.