(PS) Engelbrecht v. Union Bank
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TONYA ENGELBRECHT, Case No. 1:18-cv-00740-DAD-EPG Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION BE
v. DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, DUE TO
PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO PROSECUTE THIS
UNION BANK, et al., CASE AND FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH A
COURT ORDER
Defendants.
OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN
FOURTEEN (14) DAYS
17 Tonya Engelbrecht (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se in this action. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff filed the complaint commencing this action on March 29, 2018. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff did not pay the filing fee and instead submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 20 U.S.C. § 1915 on March 30, 2018. (ECF No. 2.) On April 4, 2018, Plaintiff filed a request to 21 amend/grant IFP status (ECF No. 4). However, Plaintiff did not use the proper form and did not 22 include all information necessary to determine whether she was entitled to proceed in forma 23…