(SS) Harrison v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 29, 20211:19-cv-01683California4,937 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 11 DONNA RAE HARRISON, Case No.: 1:19-cv-01683-BAM 12 Plaintiff, ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S

SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT

v.

ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16 17 INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Donna Rae Harrison (“Plaintiff”) seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying her application for disability insurance benefits under Title II and supplemental security income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. The matter is currently before the Court on the parties’ briefs, which were submitted, without oral argument, to Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe.1 Having considered the briefing and record in this matter, the Court finds the decision of the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) to be supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole 26 27 The parties consented to have a United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including entry of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.