Brooke

Brooke v. Superb Hospitality LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 29, 20211:20-cv-00103California9,232 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 THERESA BROOKE, CASE NO. 1:20-CV-0103 AWI SAB

Plaintiff

ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR

v. SANCTIONS, MOTION TO DISMISS,

MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY

SUPERB HOSPITALITY, LLC, d/b/a JUDGMENT, RULE 56(d) MOTION Fairfield Inn & Suites Selma/Kingsburg, FOR RELIEF, AND MOTION TO AMEND Defendants 12 (Doc. Nos. 44, 53, 54, 64)

14 This unusually contentious matter is brought by Plaintiff Theresa Brooke against 15 Defendant Superb Hospitality, LLC d/b/a Fairfield Inn & Suites Selma/Kingsburg (“Superb”). 16 The operative complaint is the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”), which seeks relief under Title 17 II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (42 U.S.C. § 12181 et seq.) (“ADA”) and California 18 Civil Code §§ 51, 52 (“Unruh Act”). Currently before the Court are three motions for sanctions 19 (two under Rule 11 and one pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1927), a combined Rule 12(b)(1), Rule 20 12(b)(6), and alternative Rule 56 partial summary judgment motion, a Rule 56(d)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.