Nueschmid
(PC) Shepherd v. Nueschmid
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CAMERON SHEPHERD, No. 2:19-cv-0084 JAM DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER ROBERT NEUSCHMID, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On screening plaintiff’s second amended complaint, this court found plaintiff alleged the following claims against defendant Cornwell, a correctional officer at California State Prison, Solano (“SOL”) and the only defendant remaining in this action: (1) excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment; (2) intentional infliction of emotional distress; and (3) negligence. (See ECF No. 18.) Before the court are plaintiff’s motion to compel responses to requests for production of documents and plaintiff’s request for subpoenas. (ECF Nos. 60, 66.) For the reasons set forth below, this court will grant in part and deny in part plaintiff’s motion to compel and will deny without prejudice plaintiff’s motion for subpoenas.…