(PS) Ferrantino v. Sacramento County Office of Education

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 29, 20212:18-cv-03063California840 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY FERRANTINO, No. 2:18-cv-3063 DB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER SACRAMENTO COUNTY OFFICE OF

EDUCATION,

15 Defendant. 17 Plaintiff Anthony Ferrantino is proceeding in this action pro se. The parties have consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). (ECF No. 41.) On June 29, 2020, the court issued a Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order setting February 19, 2021, as the deadline for the completion of discovery. (ECF No. 43.) On December 23, 2020, defendant filed a motion to compel plaintiff’s deposition and a motion to compel production of documents. (ECF Nos. 47 & 48.) After plaintiff failed to file a timely response, the court continued the hearing of motions to February 26, 2021, and issued plaintiff an order to show cause as to why this action should not be dismissed due to lack of prosecution. (ECF No. 52.) //// On February 2, 2021, plaintiff filed a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.