Anderson

(PS) Liang v. Anderson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 29, 20212:20-cv-01990California2,720 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KUANGHUEI LIANG, et al., No. 2:20-cv-1990 JAM TLN DB PS Plaintiffs, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS MICKEY ANDERSON, et al.,

Defendants. 16 Plaintiffs Kuanghuei Lang, Lijun Zhang, and Wen Sun are proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending before the court are plaintiffs’ complaint and plaintiff Kuanghuei Liang’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF Nos. 1 & 2.) Therein, plaintiffs complain about a long running dispute with their neighbors. The court is required to screen complaints brought by parties proceeding in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2); see also Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1129 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc). Here, plaintiffs’ complaint is deficient. Accordingly, for the reasons stated below, the undersigned will recommend that plaintiffs’ complaint be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.