Bell v. NuSil Technology, LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NATHAN BELL, individually, and on No. 1:20-cv-00061-NONE-JLT behalf of other members of the general public similarly situated, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
TO REMAND UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1447
Plaintiff, (Doc. No. 3) v. NUSIL TECHNOLOGY LLC, et al., Defendants. 17 Before the court is plaintiff Nathan Bell’s motion to remand this wage-and-hour putative class action to the Kern County Superior Court, where it was originally filed. (Doc. No. 3.) Plaintiff’s former employers, defendants NuSil Technology, LLC and Avantor Performance Materials, LLC, timely removed this action from state court to this federal court on January 13, 2020 pursuant to the Class Action Fairness Act (“CAFA”), 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d). (Doc. Nos. 1– 2.) Defendants have opposed the motion and plaintiff has filed a reply. (Doc. Nos. 6–7.) Pursuant to Local Rule 230(g) and General Order No. 617, the court has taken this matter under submission on the papers without holding a hearing. …