Bell v. NuSil Technology, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 31, 20211:20-cv-00061California4,537 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NATHAN BELL, individually, and on No. 1:20-cv-00061-NONE-JLT behalf of other members of the general public similarly situated, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO REMAND UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1447

Plaintiff, (Doc. No. 3) v. NUSIL TECHNOLOGY LLC, et al., Defendants. 17 Before the court is plaintiff Nathan Bell’s motion to remand this wage-and-hour putative class action to the Kern County Superior Court, where it was originally filed. (Doc. No. 3.) Plaintiff’s former employers, defendants NuSil Technology, LLC and Avantor Performance Materials, LLC, timely removed this action from state court to this federal court on January 13, 2020 pursuant to the Class Action Fairness Act (“CAFA”), 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d). (Doc. Nos. 1– 2.) Defendants have opposed the motion and plaintiff has filed a reply. (Doc. Nos. 6–7.) Pursuant to Local Rule 230(g) and General Order No. 617, the court has taken this matter under submission on the papers without holding a hearing. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.