Matevousian

(PC) Brown v. Matevousian

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 31, 20211:20-cv-00204California7,032 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JARVIS BROWN, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-00204-NONE-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION v. ) RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION

FOR FAILURE TO STATE A COGNIZABLE

ANDRE MATEVOUSIAN, et.al., ) CLAIM FOR RELIEF ) Defendants. ) (ECF No. 22) ) ) ) )

Plaintiff Jarvis Brown is appearing pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), which provides a remedy for violation of civil rights by federal actors. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s second amended complaint, filed January 8, 2021. I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.