(PC) Rivas v. Williams
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL J. RIVAS, Case No. 1:19-cv-00328-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE WILLIAMS, et al., (ECF No. 37) Defendants. TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE
17 Plaintiff Daniel J. Rivas (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 18 pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds against 19 Defendants Williams and Garcia for deliberate indifference to a serious medical need in violation 20 of the Eighth Amendment. All parties have consented to United States Magistrate Judge 21 jurisdiction. (ECF Nos. 6, 24.) 22 On February 18, 2021, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on the ground 23 that Plaintiff failed to properly exhaust his available administrative remedies. (ECF No. 37.) In 24 the motion, Plaintiff was provided with notice of the requirements for opposing a motion for 25 summary judgment. …