(PC) Perryman v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 1, 20212:19-cv-02517California1,083 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID PERRYMAN, No. 2:19-cv-2517 JAM KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS AND

REHABILITATION, et al., Defendants. 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a motion requesting that he be granted permanent PLU (“priority library user”) status for the duration of this action. In his motion, plaintiff alleges that court orders are necessary before he can use the law library because correctional officers are interfering with his access to the law library, despite his PLU status, in retaliation for his many lawsuits against the CDCR. However, in the most recent order granting plaintiff more time, the court explained to plaintiff that a civil rights complaint requires facts. (ECF No. 24.) Plaintiff is not required to cite legal authorities or cases. Plaintiff’s original complaint challenged his inability to obtain replacement orthopedic shoes or to obtain appropriate medical…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.