Chacko

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RUBY CHACKO, No. 2:19-cv-1837 JAM DB Plaintiff, v. ORDER AT&T UMBRELLA BENEFIT PLAN

NO. 3,

15 Defendant. 17 On March 26, 2021, plaintiff filed a motion to compel and noticed the motion for hearing before the undersigned on April 2, 2021, pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(1). (ECF No. 67.) On March 26, 2021, the parties filed a Joint Statement re Discovery Disagreement. (ECF No. 68.) Review of the Joint Statement finds that the nature of the parties’ dispute is—thankfully— uncommon but nonetheless disappointing. In this regard, the March 26, 2021 motion is plaintiff’s fourth motion to compel discovery from defendant. Moreover, the motion seeks to compel discovery that the undersigned already ordered defendant to produce. Specifically, on November 9, 2020 the undersigned issued an order granting plaintiff’s third motion to compel and ordering defendant to produce responsive discovery within twenty-one days. …