(SS) Stivers v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 30, 20211:19-cv-01110California6,874 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 11 RONDEE STIVERS, ) Case No.: 1:19-cv-01110-BAM ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER REGARDING SOCIAL SECURITY v. ) COMPLAINT ) ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social ) Security, ) ) Defendant. ) 16 ) 17 INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Rondee Stivers (“Plaintiff”) seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying her applications for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act and supplemental security income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. The matter is currently before the Court on the parties’ briefs, which were submitted, without oral argument, to Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe.1 Having considered the briefing and record in this matter, the Court finds the decision of the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) to be supported by substantial evidence in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.