Link

(PC) Green v. Link

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 1, 20212:19-cv-01324California361 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION 11 12 VENCIL GREEN, Case No. 2:19-cv-1324 JAM KJN P 13 Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER AND REVISED SCHEDULING ORDER v. 15 J. LINK, Defendant. 18 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel. This action proceeds on plaintiff’s claim that defendant Link retaliated against plaintiff in violation of the First Amendment. Defendant seeks modification of the court’s pretrial motion deadline in light of the recent substitution of counsel for defendant, and in order to complete settlement negotiations with plaintiff. Defendant seeks to extend the pretrial motions deadline for sixty days, until May 30, 2021. “The district court is given broad discretion in supervising the pretrial phase of litigation.” Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 607 (9th Cir. 1992) (citation and internal 27 A settlement conference is presently set in Vencil Green v. Pasioles, Case…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.