Motaghedi

Motaghedi v. Blinken

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 30, 20211:19-cv-01466California1,929 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SEYED AMIN SAM MOTAGHEDI, et al., No. 1:19-cv-01466-NONE-SKO

Plaintiffs, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED AS

MOOT, PERMITTING FILING OF MOTION v. TO AMEND, SUBSTITUTING PARTIES, AND DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT ANTONY BLINKEN,1 et al., TO TERMINATE THE MOTIONS TO DISMISS AS MOOT AND TO

ADMINISTRATIVELY TERMINATE THE

Defendants. MOTIONS TO STRIKE AND COMPEL (Doc. Nos. 57, 67 and 77) 18 Plaintiffs in this matter are United States citizens and Lawful Permanent Residents and their Iranian national relatives or fiancées applying for visas. (See Doc. No. 1 at ¶ 3.) Plaintiffs allege they have fulfilled all requirements to obtain family-based or fiancé-based visas. (Id. at ¶ 5.) Their visas were (at least initially) refused pursuant to Presidential Proclamation 9645, Enhancing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.