U.S. EEOC v. Cappo Management XXIX, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 1, 20212:20-cv-02245California729 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 US EQUAL EMPLOYMENT No. 2:20-cv-02245

OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION,

12 Plaintiff, ORDER v.

CAPPO MANAGEMENT XXIX, INC.

d/b/a HARROLD FORD, and VICTORY

AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC.,

16 Defendants.

18 Through this action, Plaintiff U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission 19 (“EEOC”) filed this lawsuit against Defendants on November 10, 2020. Aryan Rahimi 20 (“Rahimi”) filed a Charge of Discrimination that led to the EEOC’s suit. She states that 21 she was affected by the discrimination alleged in the EEOC’s Complaint. Presently 22 before the Court is Rahimi’s Motion to Intervene under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 24 filed March 1, 2021. ECF No. 6 (“Motion”). The EEOC has filed a Statement of Non- 24 Opposition. ECF No. 13. Defendants have not opposed the Motion. Rahimi ultimately 25 seeks to join the EEOC’s claim for violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 26 U.S.C. § 12112(a), and to raise additional claims both under the California Fair 27 Employment and Housing Act, Cal.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.