Conanon
(PC) Hisle v. Conanon
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 DENNIS CURTIS HISLE, No. 1:17-cv-01400-NONE-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
TO ALTER OR AMEND THE JUDGMENT
MARLYN CONANON, et al., (Doc. No. 143.) Defendants.
14 Plaintiff Dennis Curtis Hisle is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 2, 2020, defendant Dr. Conanan1 moved for summary judgment on the ground that plaintiff had failed to exhaust his administrative remedies prior to filing suit as required. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 3, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations addressing the motion for summary judgment. (Doc. No. 121.) The findings and recommendations summarized plaintiff’s claims as follows, with the final paragraph being particularly pertinent to resolution of the pending motion: …