Doe

(PC) Heim v. Doe

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 30, 20211:20-cv-00391California2,944 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHRISTOPHER HEIM, 1:20-cv-00391-AWI-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING SECOND AMENDED

COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO STATE A

vs. CLAIM, WITH LEAVE TO AMEND (ECF No. 1.) JANE DOE, et al.,

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE TO FILE

Defendants. THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

17 I. BACKGROUND Christopher Heim (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action on March 11, 2020. (ECF No. 1.) On May 14, 2020, Plaintiff filed the First Amended Complaint as a matter of course. (ECF No. 13.) On January 4, 2021, Plaintiff lodged a Second Amended Complaint, which was filed by the court on January 4, 2021. (ECF Nos. 16, 20.) Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint is now before the court for screening. 28 U.S.C. § 1915. II. SCREENING REQUIREMENT The court is required to screen…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.