Purnell
Purnell v. Hunt
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GEORGETTE G. PURNELL, Case No. 1:20-cv-01759-NONE-EPG Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION BE
v. DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, DUE TO
PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO PROSECUTE THIS
N. HUNT, et al., CASE AND FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH A
COURT ORDER
Defendants.
OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN
FOURTEEN (14) DAYS
17 Plaintiff Georgette G. Purnell (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, commenced this civil-rights action by filing her complaint on December 11, 2020. (ECF No. 1). On January 12, 2021, the Court entered a screening order. (ECF No. 5). The Court found that Plaintiff stated claims against Defendants Hunt, Luper, Garcia-Peralta and Carter for excessive force in violation of the Fourth Amendment and failed to state any other claims. The Court ordered Plaintiff to, within 30 days, file a first amended complaint, notify the Court in writing she 24 …