Khripach

(PC) Rouser v. Khripach

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 30, 20212:21-cv-00233California1,730 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM ROUSER, Case No. 2:21-cv-0233-JDP (P)

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

v. PAUPERIS JEFF LYNCH, et al., ECF No. 2 Defendants. SCREENING ORDER DISMISSING

PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT AND

GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO

AMEND WITHIN 30 DAYS

17 ECF No. 1

20 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, proceeds without counsel in this civil rights action brought 21 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Additionally, plaintiff has filed an application to proceed in forma 22 pauperis (ECF No. 2) which, together with his trust fund account statement (ECF No. 5), makes 23 the proper showing and will be granted.1 24 For the reasons set forth below, I will dismiss plaintiff’s complaint with leave to amend. 25 Plaintiff may file an amended complaint within thirty days of this order. 26 27 1 Plaintiff must pay the requisite filing fee in accordance with the concurrently filed collection…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.