(HC) Towers v. Superior Court, County of Stanislaus
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROGER TOWERS, Case No. 1:20-cv-00411-NONE-HBK Petitioner, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO
DENY PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR
v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENY
PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS
SUPERIOR COURT, COUNTY OF CORPUS1
STANISLAUS,
OBJECTIONS DUE IN THIRTY DAYS Respondent. (Doc. Nos. 19, 1) 17 18 Petitioner Roger Towers, a state probationer, initiated this action by filing a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Doc. No. 1). Before the court are petitioner’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 19), respondent’s answer to the petition (Doc. No. 22) with the state court record in support (Doc. No. 23), and petitioner’s reply. (Doc. No. 24). For the reasons set forth below, the court recommends denying the petition and denying petitioner’s motion for summary judgment. 25 26 27 1 This matter was referred to the undersigned pursuant to…