(HC) Towers v. Superior Court, County of Stanislaus

Caution
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 1, 20211:20-cv-00411California3,290 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROGER TOWERS, Case No. 1:20-cv-00411-NONE-HBK Petitioner, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DENY PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENY

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS

SUPERIOR COURT, COUNTY OF CORPUS1

STANISLAUS,

OBJECTIONS DUE IN THIRTY DAYS Respondent. (Doc. Nos. 19, 1) 17 18 Petitioner Roger Towers, a state probationer, initiated this action by filing a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Doc. No. 1). Before the court are petitioner’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 19), respondent’s answer to the petition (Doc. No. 22) with the state court record in support (Doc. No. 23), and petitioner’s reply. (Doc. No. 24). For the reasons set forth below, the court recommends denying the petition and denying petitioner’s motion for summary judgment. 25 26 27 1 This matter was referred to the undersigned pursuant to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.