Vasquez

Vasquez v. County of Stanislaus

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 31, 20211:19-cv-01610California1,137 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICARDO VASQUEZ, et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-01610-AWI-SAB 11 Plaintiffs, ORDER REQUIRING PETITIONER TO SUBMIT SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING IN v. SUPPORT OF PETITION TO COMPROMISE MINOR PLAINTIFF J.V.’S COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, et al., CLAIMS 14 Defendants. (ECF No. 42)

FOURTEEN DAY DEADLINE

16 On March 16, 2021, minor Plaintiff J.V. through their guardian ad litem Jessica Santos (“Petitioner”), filed a petition to compromise Plaintiff J.V.’s claims in this action. (ECF No. 42.) The matter is currently set for hearing before the undersigned on April 21, 2021. (ECF No. 43.) The Court has identified certain deficiencies in the petition as filed and the Court shall order supplemental briefing in advance of the hearing. Pursuant to Local Rule 202, a petition for approval of a proposed settlement of a minor’s claims must disclose, among other things, the following: the age and sex of the minor or incompetent, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.