Daram

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ERNEST LEE COX, Jr., No. 2:20-cv-01295-KJM-DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER VASUKI DARAM, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. Plaintiff moves to supplement his first amended complaint. In an order filed March 3, 2021, this court construed plaintiff’s filing as a motion to file a second amended complaint and ordered defendants to respond to plaintiff’s motion. Defendants responded that they have no opposition to plaintiff’s motion. Therefore, this court will grant plaintiff’s motion and permit plaintiff to file a second amended complaint. After that second amended complaint is filed, this court will screen it and, if plaintiff states claims cognizable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, order an answer from defendants. Plaintiff is reminded of the following standards for filing an amended complaint. In an amended complaint he must clearly identify each defendant and the action that defendant took 26 …