Ciufo

(PC) Garraway v. Ciufo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 31, 20211:17-cv-00533California221 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MITCHELL GARRAWAY, 1:17-cv-00533-DAD-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR TRIAL DATE AS PREMATURE

vs. (ECF No. 123.)

JACQUILINE CIUFO, et al., Defendants. 11 Plaintiff is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens vs. Six Unknown Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s original Complaint filed on April 17, 2017, against defendants Jacqueline Ciufo (Unit Manager), K. Miller (Corrections Officer), and Lieutenant J. Zaragoza (collectively, “Defendants”), for failure to protect Plaintiff in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (ECF No. 1.) On March 8, 2021, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting the court to schedule a trial date for this case. (ECF No. 123.) Plaintiff’s motion is premature. The court shall not schedule a trial in this case before the pending settlement conference scheduled in this case for May…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.