Arellano
Arellano v. Haskins
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ERIK ARELLANO, No. 1:17-cv-01235-NONE-JLT Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
CHAD HASKINS and FREDERICK MARTINEZ, (Doc. No. 46) 15 Defendants.
17 Plaintiff Erik Arellano (“plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed this lawsuit against Bakersfield police officers Chad Haskins and Frederick Martinez (collectively, “defendants”), asserting a claim of excessive use of force in violation of the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Presently before the court is defendants’ motion for summary judgment. (Doc. No. 46.) Plaintiff has opposed the motion1 and defendants have replied. (Doc. Nos. 53, 54.) Pursuant to Local Rule 230(g) and General Order No. 617, the court has taken this matter under submission on the papers without holding a hearing. For the reasons set forth below, defendants’ motion will be granted. ///// 27 The court issued a Rand notice to plaintiff on January…