Winkfield

(PC) Hawkins v. Winkfield

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 30, 20212:19-cv-01228California1,030 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEFF HAWKINS, No. 2:19-cv-1228 TLN KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER M. WINKFIELD, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se, in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 16, 2021, plaintiff renewed his motion to compel; defendants filed an opposition; plaintiff did not file a reply. As set forth below, plaintiff’s motion is denied. On February 16, 2021, plaintiff filed his third motion to compel. In his two page motion, plaintiff claims he propounded interrogatories to each defendant, but “defendants either avoided questions or objected. The questions were answered, are mostly objections.” (ECF No. 72 at 1.) Responses to use of force questions “are blacked out,” and “only show the involvement with plaintiff.” (Id.) Questions regarding records, audio and video were answered with manuals of the State of California. (ECF No. 72 at 2.) As exhibits, plaintiff provided 173…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.