Trujillo
Trujillo v. Conrad
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 JOSE TRUJILLO, Case No. 1:19-cv-01627-SAB Plaintiff, 9] ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT
ETHAN CONRAD, TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE
10 Defendant. DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41 (a) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL
PROCEDURE
12 (ECF No. 66) 13 On April 1, 2021, a stipulation was filed dismissing this action with prejudice and with 15 each party to bear its own costs and fees. In light of the stipulation of the parties, this action has 16 been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Gi); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 17 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice and without an award of costs or 18 attorneys’ fees. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this 20 case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule □□ (a).