Calderon

(PC) Moore v. Calderon

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 20, 20211:20-cv-00397California2,004 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TERRENCE JESSE MOORE, No. 1:20-cv-00397-DAD-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

S. CALDERON, ACTION DUE TO PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE

TO STATE A COGNIZABLE CLAIM

Defendants. (Doc. No. 14)

17 Plaintiff Terrence Jesse Moore is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 25, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge screened plaintiff’s first amended complaint (“FAC”) and issued findings and recommendations recommending that this action be dismissed due to plaintiff’s failure to state a cognizable claim. (Doc. No. 14.) In particular, the magistrate judge found that, despite the guidance provided in the screening order addressing plaintiff’s original complaint, in her…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.