Osegueda

Osegueda v. Stanislaus County Public Safety Center

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 6, 20211:16-cv-01218California1,199 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ARMANDO OSEGUEDA, et al., Case No. 1:16-cv-01218-NONE-BAM Plaintiffs, ORDER REQUIRING COUNSEL FOR

PLAINTIFF TO APPEAR APRIL 19, 2021

v. TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS

SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR FAILURE

STANISLAUS COUNTY PUBLIC TO OBEY A COURT ORDER SAFETY CENTER, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 Plaintiffs Armando Osegueda and Robert Palomino filed this action on August 16, 2016. (Doc. 1.) On February 5, 2017, a Second Amended Complaint was filed adding David Lomeli and Jairo Hernandez as Plaintiffs. (Doc. 22.) On January 29, 2019, the Court approved the parties’ stipulation to stay this matter pending resolution of the state criminal proceedings against Plaintiffs. (Doc. 50.) The Court further directed Plaintiffs to file a written status report every ninety (90) days notifying the Court of the status of the criminal matter. (Id.) On December 27, 2019, after no status reports had been filed, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause why sanctions…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.