Avalos

Avalos v. Hanford Mall 2020 LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 29, 20211:21-cv-00231California817 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GEORGE AVALOS, Case No. 1:21-cv-00231-DAD-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW

CAUSE WHY MONETARY SANCTIONS OF

v. $100 PER DAY SHOULD NOT ISSUE FOR

FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COURT ORDER

HANFORD MALL 2020 LLC, et al., AND CONTINUING MANDATORY

SCHEDULING CONFERENCE TO AUGUST 31,

Defendants. 2021

FIVE DAY DEADLINE

17 Plaintiff George Avalos filed this action pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12181 et seq., on February 22, 2021. On February 23, 2021, a scheduling order issued setting the mandatory scheduling conference for May 18, 2021. On March 22, 2021, Plaintiff returned a proof of service showing that Defendant Hanford Mall 2020 LLC had been served by substitute service on March 9, 2021 with a copy mailed on March 9, 2021. On March 24, 2021 a first amended complaint was filed adding Defendant Apple Mid Cal II LLC as a defendant. On May 20, 2021,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.