(PS) Williams v. McDonald's Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 26, 20212:20-cv-01214California784 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KIRK D. WILLIAMS, No. 2:20-cv-1214 TLN DB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER MCDONALD’S CORPORATION, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Kirk Williams is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On April 6, 2021, defendant noticed a motion to dismiss for hearing before the undersigned on May 7, 2021. (ECF No. 12.) On April 15, 2021, plaintiff filed a motion for an extension of time to file an opposition to defendant’s motion to dismiss and to prepare a motion for leave to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 13.) Plaintiff is advised that Rule 15(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that “[a] party may amend its pleading once as a matter of course within: (A) 21 days after serving it, or (B) if the pleading is one to which a responsive pleading is required, 21 days after service of a responsive pleading or 21 days…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.