Taylor
Taylor v. Taylor
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
EDWARD T. TAYLOR, III, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-00325-NONE-SAB
Plaintiffs, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT
TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST DOCKET
v. TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
STEPHANIE J. TAYLOR, et al., (ECF No. 7) Defendants.
16 This action was filed on March 4, 2021. (ECF No. 1.) On April 23, 2021, a notice of voluntary dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure was filed. As the document was filed as a motion to dismiss, a minute order was inadvertently entered continuing the scheduling conference to December 7, 2021. “[U]nder Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i), ‘a plaintiff has an absolute right to voluntarily dismiss his action prior to service by the defendant of an answer or a motion for summary judgment.’ ” Commercial Space Mgmt. Co., Inc. v. Boeing Co., Inc., 193 F.3d 1074, 1077 (9th Cir. 1999) (quoting Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997)). The Ninth Circuit has held that Rule 41(a) allows a plaintiff to…